The 55m I purchased unused as overstock and the 150mm was purchased used. They are both great and not discernibly different than the relabeled Phase D versions. I am also bundling two original 645AF non LS or D lenses that will be included, the 55mm f2.8 and the 150mm f3.5. I’m also including an unopened original Leaf firewire cable which cost $125.00. The 645DF also has an upgraded etched viewfinder which really enhances the camera and allows easier focusing which cost me $150.00(see images below). They all work and hold a charge, I have not tested the unopened battery but will by request. I’m bundling it with 3 batteries, the kit battery and two extras that cost $70.00 each. It’s like new and has never been dropped or had any issues. It will come with everything that originally was included and extras. I’m selling my Mamyia DM 28 kit (28mp Leaf Aptus II Back, Mamiya 645DF Camera Body, Mamiya Sekor 80mm f/2.8 LS D Lens) with 17,162 captures. Shipping instructions: Flat $50.00 Insured Shipping to the Contiguous United States only. Item condition: 9+ Shows little or no signs of wear
LEAF APTUS II 6 DIGITAL BACK HOW TO
If the tolerances are less than what Seitz and ALPA can accomplish, then you will need to figure out how to adjust and calibrate your camera.645DF with Leaf Aptus II 6, 80mm LS, 55mm AF,150mm AF and extras. Other than that, you need to ensure that the lens to film plane distance can be calibrated, which will be based upon the tolerances possible in your manufacturing set-up. If you design in movements, then you need some sort of handle or lever that you can quickly and easily operate to hold the camera movements in position. One big issue was proper lock-down handles (basically threaded fasteners), because everything at McMaster-Carr was physically too large for my design. I have been working on a 4x5 handheld camera with movements, and I can share a few issues that came up in design. If you want to buy one of these used, I suggest KEH in Atlanta, who currently have a few of these at reasonable prices, listed under Hasselblad Camera Bodies heading. A digital back would be a simple mounting to either of these, though an adapter. There was also an older FlexBody Hasselblad, which is slightly different construction. Recall that the image circle of many Zeiss lenses for Hasselblad cameras will not cover much more than 56mm by 56mm, which does not leave much room for movements. However, it uses mostly Rodenstock lenses, though I think Hasselblad made an adapter to use some Zeiss lenses. I think the Hasselblad Arc Body is what you are describing. For something on the order of $4,000 you can be set up to have the same mp resolution without the hassle of designing and manufacturing something. I understand that the sensor size of the Leaf back is larger but, if I were you, I would strongly consider the 5D Mark II with the Canon tilt/shift lenses. If you're going to the expense and trouble of mfg a "one off" camera, why not use something akin to a view camera and thus you already have the provision for lens and bellows? This, it would appear to me, would solve the coverage and the movement problems at the same time.Īnother thought that occurs is this. However to be sure you should contact Hasselblad. What are the points that need special attention in the camera design.I think that you will run into coverage problems with Hasselblad lenses. Are lenses from Hasselblad good for this shifting lens standard as the fact that they are designed for 6cm x 6cm film?ģ. The rear standard and front standard are connected by a bellow. Of course, shifting function is added to the lens standard. Just come to an idea that to put Hasselblad lenses on a DIY camera body where I attach the digital back. Whereas GX680 could do the job since it offers rise/fall of lens standard but lenses are not as sharp as Hasselblads'. I like Hasselblad lenses which give me very sharp and colorful pictures but no shift to correct vertical lines when shooting buildings. I put a Leaf Aptus 22 back to Hasselblad and Fuji GX680. Currently face a dilemma of adapting digital back to traditional camera.
0 kommentar(er)
